From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10149 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2006 23:24:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 10141 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2006 23:24:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:24:22 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6DNNmkd000917; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:23:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6DNNlha028711; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:23:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k6DNNlZR025682; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:23:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200607132323.k6DNNlZR025682@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060711224806.GA1686@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:48:06 -0400) Subject: Re: [rft/symtab] Check the sizes of minimal symbols References: <20060707035420.GA8071@nevyn.them.org> <200607092026.k69KQKQg027664@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060709203557.GA21606@nevyn.them.org> <200607112200.k6BM0nQT004757@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060711224806.GA1686@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:48:06 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:00:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Yes it does. No regressions on OpenBSD/i386. I'll try some of the > > other architectures as well later this week. Any in particular that > > you'd like to see tested? > > Nothing jumps out at me; the things that seem likely to be a problem > are e.g. hppa/ia64/ppc64. Well, I checked OpenBSD/sparc64, OpenBSD/mips64 and OpenBSD/powerpc, and didn't see any regressions. I'd say, go ahead and commit this, and hope it doesn't break any of hppa/ia64/ppc64. Mark