From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7247 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2006 23:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 7236 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2006 23:16:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:16:49 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6DNGFNp032637; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:16:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6DNGEBi003616; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k6DNGE9c016595; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:16:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200607132316.k6DNGE9c016595@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060713194731.GA1709@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:47:31 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: Re: [patch] Fix for 'info threads' crashes if zombie threads exist References: <20060620130932.GA21490@nevyn.them.org> <200606201524.45099.bartoschek@or.uni-bonn.de> <20060620132737.GA21951@nevyn.them.org> <20060619165609.GA14691@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20060620170451.GA17022@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20060620171109.GA28310@nevyn.them.org> <20060620185326.GA9482@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20060620190740.GA31643@nevyn.them.org> <20060713040135.GY24622@nevyn.them.org> <200607131849.k6DInqeJ029991@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060713194731.GA1709@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:47:31 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > You might want to look at implementing to_extra_thread_info() to give > > some state information; see bsd-uthread.c for an example. > > ... and in any case that's a better place for the state information. > Nice. Unfortunately we don't really have useful state bits. I could > probably move the exiting/missing text there. That's what I had in mind... > I'll keep that in mind for a future update, thanks! Well, if this patch doesn't cause any regressions, there is no real reason to hold it back. You can always add the to_extra_thread_info() implementation later. Mark