Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips-tdep.c: Fix bug in evaluating signed address
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060713115456.GU8759@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060712193149.GP24622@nevyn.them.org>

On Jul 12 15:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:23:32PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the below patch fixes the mips_integer_to_address function.  What
> > happens is this:
> > 
> > If the incoming type is an *unsigned* value, then unpack_long takes the
> > (un)signedness into account.  This results in `val' not being signed
> > extended, as the mips_integer_to_address function was originally
> > designed for.
> > 
> > So, to enforce correct signedness of the resulting address, I changed
> > the unpack_long call to extract_signed_integer.  This way, val is always
> > sign extended and the mips address is correctly signed.
> 
> I might be missing something, but isn't the function mostly redundant
> now?
> 
> > Index: gdb/mips-tdep.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/gnupro/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.24
> > diff -u -p -r1.24 mips-tdep.c
> > --- gdb/mips-tdep.c	15 Jun 2006 08:57:17 -0000	1.24
> > +++ gdb/mips-tdep.c	16 Jun 2006 16:15:48 -0000
> > @@ -4749,7 +4749,7 @@ mips_integer_to_address (struct gdbarch 
> >  			 struct type *type, const gdb_byte *buf)
> >  {
> >    gdb_byte *tmp = alloca (TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_data_ptr));
> > -  LONGEST val = unpack_long (type, buf);
> > +  LONGEST val = extract_signed_integer (buf, TYPE_LENGTH (type));
> >    store_signed_integer (tmp, TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_data_ptr), val);
> >    return extract_signed_integer (tmp,
> >  				 TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_data_ptr));
> 
> Those last two have got to be a no-op.

Hmm, yes, you're right.  I didn't realize that when changing unpack_long
to extract_signed_integer.  Thanks, correct version below.


Corinna

	* mips-tdep.c (mips_integer_to_address): Simplify be calling
	extract_signed_integer directly.  Fix comment.


Index: mips-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.396
diff -u -p -r1.396 mips-tdep.c
--- mips-tdep.c	19 Jun 2006 18:50:09 -0000	1.396
+++ mips-tdep.c	13 Jul 2006 11:36:13 -0000
@@ -4647,19 +4647,14 @@ mips_register_sim_regno (int regnum)
 }
 
 
-/* Convert an integer into an address.  By first converting the value
-   into a pointer and then extracting it signed, the address is
-   guarenteed to be correctly sign extended.  */
+/* Convert an integer into an address.  Extracting the value signed
+   guarantees a correctly sign extended address.  */
 
 static CORE_ADDR
 mips_integer_to_address (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 			 struct type *type, const gdb_byte *buf)
 {
-  gdb_byte *tmp = alloca (TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_data_ptr));
-  LONGEST val = unpack_long (type, buf);
-  store_signed_integer (tmp, TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_data_ptr), val);
-  return extract_signed_integer (tmp,
-				 TYPE_LENGTH (builtin_type_void_data_ptr));
+  return (CORE_ADDR) extract_signed_integer (buf, TYPE_LENGTH (type));
 }
 
 static void

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-13 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-16 16:23 Corinna Vinschen
2006-06-28 13:22 ` Corinna Vinschen
2006-07-12 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-13 11:55   ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2006-07-13 13:00     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-13 13:15       ` Corinna Vinschen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060713115456.GU8759@calimero.vinschen.de \
    --to=vinschen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox