From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23814 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2006 04:50:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 23805 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2006 04:50:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:50:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4E348CED0; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22205-01-5; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (S0106000625ac85e1.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.27.110]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEC148CEAC; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D18B147EFA; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands Message-ID: <20060712045018.GE1262@adacore.com> References: <20060705230129.GA1145@nevyn.them.org> <20060706044733.GC673@adacore.com> <1152198199.6282.63.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060706162952.GB24631@nevyn.them.org> <20060707052219.GA971@adacore.com> <20060711124739.GA18324@nevyn.them.org> <20060711222524.GC1262@adacore.com> <20060711225019.GB1686@nevyn.them.org> <20060712034731.GA7182@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060712034731.GA7182@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 > > If you mean the case that the sources are moved from C:/foo to D:/foo, > > then it should be handled, I think. > > Oh, OK. Then we can do this the easy way and not worry specially about > drive prefixes, and use IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH. In which case would IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH be necessary? I think I'm missing that case. -- Joel