From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9089 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2006 23:00:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9076 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2006 23:00:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:00:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CCD48CEB7 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:00:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17585-03-5 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:00:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (S0106000625ac85e1.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.27.110]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805CC48CE15 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:00:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D092047EFA; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands Message-ID: <20060711230017.GD1262@adacore.com> References: <20060705215606.GF3580@adacore.com> <20060705230129.GA1145@nevyn.them.org> <20060706044733.GC673@adacore.com> <1152198199.6282.63.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060706162952.GB24631@nevyn.them.org> <20060707052219.GA971@adacore.com> <20060711124739.GA18324@nevyn.them.org> <20060711222524.GC1262@adacore.com> <20060711225019.GB1686@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060711225019.GB1686@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 > Isn't this just IS_DIR_SEPARATOR ? You probably want to use > FILENAME_CMP too. Yes, you're right. I forgot about the include directory again when I was searching for this. Since I'm deep into this code, I think I'll take the time to implement multiple substitution rules too. I've had so much feedback about this, it's only fair. > The other question is what to do with "C:" on cygwin/mingw32. > I haven't thought about that. I'd feel free to not worry about it, and > then if it becomes a problem for someone using Windows they can fix > it (which might be me, later - I expect CodeSourcery to want to do the > same thing Andrew Stubbs was talking about and set this up to work > magically). That works for me. Let's worry about that later if it impacts someone. Thanks again, -- Joel