From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28778 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2006 22:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 28770 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2006 22:31:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-71-248-179-44.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (71.248.179.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:31:56 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id C7A2213C020; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:31:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:31:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands Message-ID: <20060711223154.GB3245@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20060705215606.GF3580@adacore.com> <20060705230129.GA1145@nevyn.them.org> <20060706044733.GC673@adacore.com> <1152198199.6282.63.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060706162952.GB24631@nevyn.them.org> <20060707052219.GA971@adacore.com> <20060711124739.GA18324@nevyn.them.org> <20060711222524.GC1262@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060711222524.GC1262@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 03:25:24PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> 2. Should the end of the rule be anchored to end of string or >> directory separator? > >I was thinking about this, and almost ready to implement it. But >then I thought about the Windows case. On cygwin, the directory >separator is '/', but then some tools probably use '\' and we >accept it. On MinGW, the standard directory separator is '\', but >GCC at least uses forward slashes as far as I know. FWIW, I'm perfectly fine with accepting only '/' on Cygwin but I doubt that helps much. cgf