From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11625 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2006 04:47:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 11616 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2006 04:47:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:47:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB1848CE42 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24834-01-8 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (S0106000625ac85e1.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.27.110]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B3348CE3C for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 00:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id D0CC147E7F; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:47:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands Message-ID: <20060706044733.GC673@adacore.com> References: <20060705215606.GF3580@adacore.com> <20060705230129.GA1145@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060705230129.GA1145@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 > Given your later explanation that you only support one entry, I find > "substitute-path add" a bit confusing. Shall we take a moment to think > about a general interface for lists? > > If we had one, we could use it for other variables, and we could access > this using something like -gdb-set. Would you mind making a design proposal? I'm not sure to understand what you exactly you are thinking about. I think I understand the fact that you would like to have more than one rule because "add" doesn't suggest "replace", but I am not sure I get the rest :-/. Thanks, -- Joel