From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6798 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2006 21:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6790 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2006 21:22:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:22:27 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ftt6a-0001Gx-IQ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:22:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: PAUL GILLIAM Cc: Alan Modra , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Strange stepping behaviour with ppc32 with secure PLTs Message-ID: <20060623212220.GA4551@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: PAUL GILLIAM , Alan Modra , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20060513143141.GB19700@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20060513145829.GA3721@nevyn.them.org> <20060515005619.GC19700@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20060515150854.GA28766@nevyn.them.org> <20060515234620.GG19700@bubble.grove.modra.org> <200605160634.k4G6Y49p009983@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060516071833.GH19700@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1148055854.315.5.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060520011451.GE22757@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1151092884.7608.82.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1151092884.7608.82.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:01:24PM -0700, PAUL GILLIAM wrote: > It's been more than a month, so I thought I'd try again. I remain convinced that this is not the correct solution. The discussion you're replying to talks about a better way to identify such stubs using code reading. If the symbols is "defined" in the undefined section, we don't have reliable information about what it really means. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery