From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3209 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2006 19:51:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3199 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2006 19:51:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:51:37 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ftrgl-0000bb-6q; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:51:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Wu Zhou Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] decimal float point patch based on libdecnumber: testcase Message-ID: <20060623195135.GA2302@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060622202457.GA22230@nevyn.them.org> <20060623023808.GA1781@nevyn.them.org> <20060623184946.GA32680@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 03:25:10AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > So what is XFAIL intended for? In my opinion, it is intended for failure, > but an expected failure. I guess it can be used for such situation like: > the output is expected, but is not what we want at last. We might fix > that at a later time. > > Just my two cents anyway. Correct me if I am wrong. *shrug* It's not a big deal. I'm happy with them xfailing, but then you have to have some guess as to what the pass output would be. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery