From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24777 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2006 04:04:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 24767 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2006 04:03:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:03:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD4048CE97 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27680-01-7 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:03:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A318F48CE8F for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:03:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 0081547E7F; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:04:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ob] Eliminate another gdb_suppress_entire_file Message-ID: <20060623040352.GK976@adacore.com> References: <20060622195839.GA20890@nevyn.them.org> <20060623031029.GI976@adacore.com> <20060623032215.GA2754@nevyn.them.org> <20060623033531.GJ976@adacore.com> <20060623033948.GA3253@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060623033948.GA3253@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00351.txt.bz2 > I've been using untested followed by return. Why wouldn't that be > ideal? It's actually pretty good. I think in some cases unsupported might be a better choice, but I like untested too, because it's always going to be true... I see in your patch that you used the name of the .exp file as the argument of untested. Should we do that, or should we try to preserve the string we previously used with gdb_suppress_entire_file? -- Joel