From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15636 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2006 03:40:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 15628 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2006 03:39:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:39:58 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FtcWK-0000qm-Pi; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:39:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ob] Eliminate another gdb_suppress_entire_file Message-ID: <20060623033948.GA3253@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060622195839.GA20890@nevyn.them.org> <20060623031029.GI976@adacore.com> <20060623032215.GA2754@nevyn.them.org> <20060623033531.GJ976@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060623033531.GJ976@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:35:31PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Oh ho, I just did a quick grep, and found 352 occurences. > That's a lot of work... I wonder if we could do that in a mechanical > way. It seems as though replacing this by an error followed by a return > would be OK, but not ideal. I've been using untested followed by return. Why wouldn't that be ideal? > Hmmm. Perhaps a first step to stop any potential spread would be to > rename it deprecated_gdb_suppress_entire_file. Just as much work as changing it, really... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery