Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:26:33AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:16:54 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > 
> > > It's not bad, but the following might be better:
> > > 
> > >   @item  @r{(empty)}
> > 
> > That seems to give me @samp{@r{(empty)}}, which comes out as `(empty)'
> > with the apostrophes in @samp and the (empty) in @r.
> 
> You could use @table @code and add the apostrophes manually where you
> want them.

Turns out that doesn't work either: both @code and @samp have implicit
apostrophes in Info output.  So while this looks a little better in the
PDF, it's nasty in Info.

I'm going to leave it as @item, since that's already used in a number
of places throughout this chapter.  If we want to improve this later,
we can do it more consistently.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery