From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-44614-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11044 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2006 01:23:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 11036 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2006 01:23:40 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:23:38 +0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) 	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5I1MFrO024746; 	Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:22:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5I1MFWB013953; 	Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:22:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5I1MF4M006185; 	Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:22:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:23:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200606180122.k5I1MF4M006185@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: nathan@codesourcery.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, schwab@suse.de
In-reply-to: <44897213.3070309@codesourcery.com> (message from Nathan Sidwell 	on Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:05:23 +0100)
Subject: Re: [m68k]  return values
References:  <44897213.3070309@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:05:23 +0100
> From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
> 
> this is a reworking of my recent return value patch.  this patch
> just contains changes to select which register contains a pointer
> value, and how structure return values are located.
> 
> I've added tdep field 'ptr_value_regnum' to accommodate the
> different ABIs that return in %d0 or %a0.
> 
> Most of the patch is adding the necessary pieces to the os sniffers to 
> initialize that value.
> 
> ok?

Please don't check this in until I've reviewed this.  Some time ago
(two years?) I did examine very carefully what ABI's where in you use
for Linux, NetBSD/m68k and OpenBSD/m68k, and some of the things in
your patch seem to contradict what I learned back then.

I will try to look at it ASAP.

Mark