Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe

Nathan Sidwell
2006-06-13T08:43:26Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> Comments? Questions? Otherwise, I will plan to commit this in a week.
> I haven't seen any objections to the latest version of the proposal,
> although I'm somewhat suspicious that I've just talked everyone else
> into the ground.

Can you clarify something for me? If a stub recieves a 'qSupported:foo' packet,
should it still respond with any default information it might have -- such as
the PacketSize response? Or should such default responses only be sent for an
unadorned qSupported packet?

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk