Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-06-13T18:43:18Z

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:41:19PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:07:28 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > > Can you clarify something for me? If a stub recieves a 'qSupported:foo'
> > > packet, should it still respond with any default information it might have
> > > -- such as the PacketSize response? Or should such default responses only
> > > be sent for an unadorned qSupported packet?
> >
> > qSupported:foo means "I'm GDB, I support the "foo" feature, what do you
> > support?". The stub's response should be independent of the arguments
> > in the packet.
>
> Daniel, if Nathan didn't understand this from the text, it's a clear
> sign that something like the above should be added to make things more
> self-explanatory.

Yes, I'll plan to add a note about this and repost; I'm just not going
to do it today.