Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe

Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-13T18:23:06Z

> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:53:13 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> Eli, there's a big chunk of texinfo in here. It's been basically rewritten
> since the last time I posted a texinfo version of the documentation; could
> you take a look at it, please?

Taking a look...

> +@table @samp
> +@item @var{stubfeature} @r{[};@var{stubfeature}@r{]}@dots{}
> +The stub supports or does not support each returned @var{stubfeature},
> +depending on the form of each @var{stubfeature} (see below for the
> +possible forms).
> +@item
> +An empty reply indicates that @samp{qSupported} is not recognized,
> +or that no features needed to be reported to @value{GDBN}.

Did you look at how this empty @item is typeset in the printed version
of the manual? I suspect it won't do what you want. Perhaps saying
"(@emph{empty})" explicitly will look better.

Other than that, I'm happy with the doco patch. Thanks!