From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9192 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2006 17:40:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 9183 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2006 17:40:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:40:35 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FqCsQ-0003k6-IG; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:40:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Wu Zhou Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, DJ Delorie Subject: Re: About decimal floating point support Message-ID: <20060613174030.GA14283@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, DJ Delorie References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:51:23PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > What is your current thought about this? Do you still think it is more > feasible to put libdecnumber at the top level repository? I am now > considering copy the code of libdecnumber (which is at the top level of > gcc repository) to the top level of gdb repository. and use that to > re-implment DFP support. If the code of libdecnumber is changed, we can > synchronize that to gdb repository. Then gdb developers don't need to > maintain these sensitive numeric code. > > What do you think on this? Your comments are highly appreciated! I think it's a good idea. DJ, if we copied libdecnumber to src, would you be able to add it to your sync scripts? The src copy would be strictly read-only. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery