From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-44527-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3034 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2006 20:59:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 3025 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2006 20:59:02 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from w099.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO duck.specifix.com) (64.220.152.99)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:59:01 +0000
Received: from [::1] (duck.specifix.com [64.220.152.99]) 	by duck.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP 	id 2F858FC8B; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
Reply-To: fnf@specifix.com
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] replace stub fn mips_eabi_return_value
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:59:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, 	GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
References: <447E2CF3.4070102@redhat.com> <20060609184026.GC860@adacore.com> <448DBFE5.9040309@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <448DBFE5.9040309@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200606121700.08563.fnf@specifix.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2

On Monday 12 June 2006 15:26, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Fred, your similar code for o64 also makes use of register_size.

Actually it appears that it is mips_n32n64_return_value that uses
register_size, not mips_o64_return_value.

-Fred