From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7599 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2006 19:59:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 7590 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2006 19:59:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:59:32 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FnLEY-000878-6K for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:59:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: starting gdb/mi from FE Message-ID: <20060605195930.GA31015@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060605134517.GA25925@brasko.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060605134517.GA25925@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 09:45:17AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > This will allow the FE to start GDB 1 time and to determine which > version of the protocol GDB was compatible with. If you have multiple > interpreter choices on the -i switch, then GDB will output the first > line it writes as > mi_protocol_version=miN > where miN will be the version GDB is going to communicate with. > > This change is backwards compatible because users were not able in the > past to have a comma separated list in the -i flag. > > How does this look? We've discussed this at least twice in the past, haven't we? How about a pointer to those past conversations; did they reach a conclusion, or not - and if they did, was it this one? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery