From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1848 invoked by alias); 18 May 2006 00:07:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 1825 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2006 00:07:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 00:07:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A9248CE43; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:07:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21964-01; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:07:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC9948CDF2; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:07:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 8921A47E81; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 01:35:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: PAUL GILLIAM Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Move the frame zero PC check earlier Message-ID: <20060517155729.GF27234@adacore.com> References: <20060510180312.GA12606@nevyn.them.org> <200605130946.k4D9kZ2M001331@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060513151338.GB3721@nevyn.them.org> <200605131642.k4DGgiqa018273@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060516204503.GC13210@nevyn.them.org> <200605162137.k4GLbZiS014187@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060516221837.GA15617@nevyn.them.org> <1147815745.3672.163.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1147815745.3672.163.camel@dufur.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 FWIW, I read the whole thread a couple of times, and I agree with Daniel. Something that I have also noticed is that these bogus frames actually cause the average users to lose confidence in the entire backtrace. I think that stopping at PC == 0 for all architecture is a good approach, and his justification for it is convincinng. -- Joel