Re: [RFC] DWARF 2 address size != pointer size

Fred Fish
2006-05-12T14:19:48Z

On Thursday 11 May 2006 18:44, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Technically, this isn't quite right, since each CU could potentially
> have a different address size. It's not a global property of the
> debug info.

Correct. I think my patches have a comment related to that.

> Here's the patch; is it addressing the same thing yours does? I'm not
> sure it deals with frame info right, but I'm pretty sure the rest of
> it is going in the right direction:

I tried applying it, but it didn't apply cleanly and I gave up trying
to fix it up after I found out it uses code that was deleted a couple
years ago (dwarf2_pinfo for example).

-Fred