From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-44077-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15254 invoked by alias); 11 May 2006 00:58:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 15241 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2006 00:58:18 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from w099.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO duck.specifix.com) (64.220.152.99)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 00:58:17 +0000
Received: from [::1] (duck.specifix.com [64.220.152.99]) 	by duck.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP 	id 568CFFC6F; Wed, 10 May 2006 17:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
Reply-To: fnf@specifix.com
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to skip_prologue_using_sal() for oneline stub functions
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:58:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <200605101113.50267.fnf@specifix.com> <vt2wtctwmf7.fsf@theseus.home.>
In-Reply-To: <vt2wtctwmf7.fsf@theseus.home.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605102058.55878.fnf@specifix.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2

On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:21, Jim Blandy wrote:
> This looks reasonable; have you tested on IA-32, too?

I tested it with an i686-pc-linux-gnu target, if that is what you
mean.  There were no regressions or other changes in the gdb testsuite
results.

-Fred