From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15850 invoked by alias); 5 May 2006 14:53:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 15842 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2006 14:53:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 14:53:52 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Fc1gj-0007X6-MO for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 05 May 2006 10:53:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:53:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes Message-ID: <20060505145349.GB28855@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20060505135124.GA27371@nevyn.them.org> <200605051838.20652.ghost@cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605051838.20652.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 06:38:19PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > The reason I've included them in patch is that I've learned about Emacs's > add-change-log-entry command, which conveniently adds entry to existing > file ;-) So, in case if there are several ChangeLog files in patch, I should > put those entries separately, and indicate which file each entry goes to, > right? Right. I usually don't bother when it's obvious (e.g. there's only one file named gdb.texinfo, and it's obviously in gdb/doc/). Alexandre Oliva wrote a script to pull the entries out of diffs automatically, if you prefer. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery