From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15416 invoked by alias); 5 May 2006 14:52:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 15397 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2006 14:52:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 14:52:27 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Fc1fN-0007WG-3u; Fri, 05 May 2006 10:52:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -stack-list-frames HIGH_FRAME changes Message-ID: <20060505145225.GA28855@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20060505135124.GA27371@nevyn.them.org> <200605051838.20652.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20060505144843.GA10374@brasko.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060505144843.GA10374@brasko.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:48:43AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > Please don't add new tests to just mi2-stack.exp. I don't much care > > > whether mi2-stack.exp is updated or not, but when we finalize mi3 and > > > create mi3-* tests, they're going to be copied from mi-*. So it's > > > important that new tests go there also. > > > > So, what's the point of mi2 tests at all? > > In any case, there's revised patch: > > The mi- tests are the "current" MI tests. The mi2- tests make sure that > gdb -i=mi2 work. > > So, at some point in the future we will make mi- tests become mi3-, we > will still have mi2- and mi- will become the new "current" MI tests. Well, actually, shortly after that point we may drop the mi2-* tests. We discuss this every couple of months and get ourselves more confused each time :-) Since -i=mi currently sets MI == 2, it's all quite unclear. I'm just trying not to rock the boat. If someone wants to propose a reorganization, more power to them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery