From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30648 invoked by alias); 4 May 2006 15:40:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 30634 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2006 15:40:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 May 2006 15:40:29 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FbfwJ-0000hZ-Si; Thu, 04 May 2006 11:40:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 15:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: DJ Delorie , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [v850 sim] correcting psw flags for divide special cases. Message-ID: <20060504154027.GA2537@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: DJ Delorie , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200604132336.k3DNan1h001282@greed.delorie.com> <20060414203520.GA23815@nevyn.them.org> <200604171935.k3HJZKco019005@greed.delorie.com> <20060417194951.GA24161@nevyn.them.org> <200604172020.k3HKKHXl020924@greed.delorie.com> <20060418192447.GB14876@nevyn.them.org> <200604181936.k3IJa7m0004548@greed.delorie.com> <20060420130921.GA11710@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060420130921.GA11710@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:09:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 03:36:07PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > There's probably a number of people in my position, who occasionally > > do support outside of their mainstream maintainerships, and have > > enough expertise to do so independently, but not enough time to commit > > to a maintainership. A consistent solution to this would be > > worthwhile. > > If only we already had one.... done and done. It's as simple as > the below. Does anyone object to this change? If not, let's do it, > and then you can commit your own v850 fixes. No objections, so committed. DJ, I'm not planning to go back and look at any v850 patches you've submitted; as far as I'm concerned you can now commit them on your own authority, and I don't think my looking at them would do any good anyway. Let me know if you need eyes on a particular patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery