From: Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch for mips_o64_return_value to fix calling functions by hand (additional patch)
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 20:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605021630.15861.fnf@specifix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604271004.44938.fnf@specifix.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3192 bytes --]
On Thursday 27 April 2006 10:04, Fred Fish wrote:
> I'm doing some work with a mips64-elf toolchain and took a look at why
> there are so many gdb testsuite failures. One problem I found is that
> calling functions by hand was broken,
For mips_o64_push_dummy_call, mips_abi_regsize(gdbarch) always
evaluates to 8, and was suppressing a needed left shift of struct and
union arguments passed big endian.
Attached is an additional patch which fixes the following FAILs:
< FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_char(*cflags)
< FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_short(*sflags)
< FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags(*flags)
< FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_three_chars(*three_char)
< FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_five_chars(*five_char)
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 1 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 2 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 4 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 5 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 6 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 7 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 9 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 10 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 11 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 12 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 13 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 14 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 15 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 17 structs-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 1 structs-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 2 structs-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 5 structs-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 1 structs-ti
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-ti
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 1 structs-tl
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tl
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 1 structs-tf
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tf
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 2 structs-ts-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-ts-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 4 structs-ts-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 5 structs-ts-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 8 structs-ts-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 6 structs-ti-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 6 structs-tl-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 6 structs-tf-tc
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 2 structs-tc-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tc-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 5 structs-tc-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 6 structs-tc-ts
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tc-ti
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tc-tl
< FAIL: gdb.base/structs.exp: p/c L<n>; call 3 structs-tc-tf
-Fred
[-- Attachment #2: struct-union-fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1518 bytes --]
2006-05-02 Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com>
* mips-tdep.c (mips_o64_push_dummy_call): Left shift big endian
structs or unions independent of ABI register size.
Index: mips-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroots/latest/src/gdb/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.4
diff -c -p -r1.1.1.4 mips-tdep.c
*** mips-tdep.c 22 Apr 2006 17:31:07 -0000 1.1.1.4
--- mips-tdep.c 2 May 2006 18:19:01 -0000
*************** mips_o64_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch
*** 3721,3728 ****
It does not seem to be necessary to do the
same for integral types.
- Also don't do this adjustment on O64 binaries.
-
cagney/2001-07-23: gdb/179: Also, GCC, when
outputting LE O32 with sizeof (struct) <
mips_abi_regsize(), generates a left shift as
--- 3721,3726 ----
*************** mips_o64_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch
*** 3737,3744 ****
identified as such and GDB gets tweaked
accordingly. */
! if (mips_abi_regsize (gdbarch) < 8
! && TARGET_BYTE_ORDER == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG
&& partial_len < mips_abi_regsize (gdbarch)
&& (typecode == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT ||
typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION))
--- 3735,3741 ----
identified as such and GDB gets tweaked
accordingly. */
! if (TARGET_BYTE_ORDER == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG
&& partial_len < mips_abi_regsize (gdbarch)
&& (typecode == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT ||
typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-02 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-27 14:04 [RFA] Patch for mips_o64_return_value to fix calling functions by hand Fred Fish
2006-05-02 20:29 ` Fred Fish [this message]
2006-05-05 17:11 ` [RFA] Patch for mips_o64_return_value to fix calling functions by hand (additional patch) Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-05 18:06 ` [commit] " Fred Fish
2006-05-05 17:13 ` [RFA] Patch for mips_o64_return_value to fix calling functions by hand Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-05 17:55 ` [commit] " Fred Fish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200605021630.15861.fnf@specifix.com \
--to=fnf@specifix.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox