From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16742 invoked by alias); 1 May 2006 17:06:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 16734 invoked by uid 22791); 1 May 2006 17:06:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:06:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B821548CBEA; Mon, 1 May 2006 13:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23241-01-10; Mon, 1 May 2006 13:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7054648CBD5; Mon, 1 May 2006 13:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id A563B47E7F; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 17:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA/i386] pb reading insns if breakpoints still inserted Message-ID: <20060501170639.GJ930@adacore.com> References: <20060428171154.GP17613@adacore.com> <200605011636.k41GaO8I027381@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605011636.k41GaO8I027381@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 Thanks for the really quick review, Mark. > After another day of thinking I came to the conclusion that jimb is > probably right about the premature deprecation of memory_read_nobpt. > If we undeprecate it, you wouldn't really need your new read_insn > function, since it really would be the same as memory_read_nobpt. FWIW, I like this approach too. I can submit a new set of patches as soon as this becomes the consensus. -- Joel