From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17912 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2006 00:44:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 17903 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2006 00:44:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:44:32 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FYucQ-0003GT-Ap for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:44:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename "delete-fork" to "delete fork" Message-ID: <20060427004430.GB12481@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: GDB Patches References: <4450068F.4000303@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4450068F.4000303@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 04:47:27PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Hi, > > This is to remove the ambiguity between 'delete' and 'delete-fork' > (by using the already-in-place mechanism that I should have used > in the first place). > > I will still need to handle "detach-fork", which will probably > require making "detach" into a prefix command like "delete". > Thought I'd do that in a separate step. > > I also elaborated the "info fork" command so that it could take > a fork id as argument -- mainly because it facilitates testing. Looks sensible to me - thanks for fixing this. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery