From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4056 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2006 16:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3981 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2006 16:07:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:07:20 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FWbgb-0004W3-3F; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:07:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:07:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Reverse debugging, part 3/3: user interface / docs Message-ID: <20060420160717.GF11710@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <442DAAD9.6080509@redhat.com> <44442877.1060401@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44442877.1060401@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:44:55PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Hi Eli, > > Please see revised patch, attached. > OK now? FWIW, I've got no opinions on this patch. The content looks fine. My only concern is that I don't much like "set" variables which succeed or fail depending on the target - we can switch targets unexpectedly. Can we just give the error in proceed if the target can't run in reverse? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery