From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31348 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2006 22:24:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 31280 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2006 22:24:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:24:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3JMOSm3026419 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:24:28 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3JMORYs021143 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:24:27 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-91.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.91]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3JMORJj027799 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:24:27 -0400 Received: from ironwood.lan (ironwood.lan [192.168.64.8]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k3JMOR5w015589 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:24:27 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:24:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Add missing Morpho coprocessor registers Message-ID: <20060419152425.335b3c94@ironwood.lan> In-Reply-To: <200604190457.k3J4vwEt004545@sethra.codesourcery.com> References: <200604190457.k3J4vwEt004545@sethra.codesourcery.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:57:58 -0700 Mark Mitchell wrote: > This patch adds a few missing registers to the MT port. > > OK to apply? Am I still the maintainer for this? (The MAINTAINERS file says that I'm maintainer for ms1, but says nothing about mt. Also, I see no ChangeLog entry which says when ms1-tdep.c was changed to mt-tdep.c.) Anyway, this change is okay with me. Kevin