From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13944 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2006 20:20:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 13920 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2006 20:20:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:20:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3HKKSIX004897; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:20:28 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3HKKNuR016051; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:20:23 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3HKKN523639; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:20:23 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3HKKMpv020927; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:20:22 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k3HKKHXl020924; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:20:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200604172020.k3HKKHXl020924@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060417194951.GA24161@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:49:51 -0400) Subject: Re: [v850 sim] correcting psw flags for divide special cases. References: <200604132336.k3DNan1h001282@greed.delorie.com> <20060414203520.GA23815@nevyn.them.org> <200604171935.k3HJZKco019005@greed.delorie.com> <20060417194951.GA24161@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 > In the mean time, would you be willing to be listed as maintainer > for the v850 sim? I do not believe there is anyone better qualified > at the moment; in fact, I don't see any other way to get v850 > patches reviewed :-) I hesitate to take on yet another responsibility, if I spread myself too thin I won't feel right about how much attention I can give to each area. Besides, if you look at the ChangeLog you'd see that I'm far from the most prolific contributor. Now, if I had a pile of v850 eval boards on my desk (like I do for the m32c) that would be a different story ;-)