From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17711 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2006 19:35:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 17702 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2006 19:35:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:35:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3HJZVuj024169; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:35:31 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3HJZQ9J005293; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:35:26 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3HJZP518704; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:35:25 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3HJZPmd019008; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:35:25 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k3HJZKco019005; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:35:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:35:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200604171935.k3HJZKco019005@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060414203520.GA23815@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:35:20 -0400) Subject: Re: [v850 sim] correcting psw flags for divide special cases. References: <200604132336.k3DNan1h001282@greed.delorie.com> <20060414203520.GA23815@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 > The problem with patches without any human-readable text is we don't > know what you expect of them... are you asking for approval? I can see how that would be confusing. I will try to remember to add at least "Ok?" or "Applied" from now on.