From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8628 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2006 18:42:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 8620 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2006 18:42:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:42:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FUpjM-0002eJ-0v; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:42:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Masaki MURANAKA , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Signal definitions for host=mingw32/target=*-*-* Message-ID: <20060415184247.GA10060@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Masaki MURANAKA , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <44354465-FF5A-4042-B0C3-10E4823D17E3@monami-software.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:25:05PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Index: gdb/remote-sim.c > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /home/cvs/pizzafactory/gdb/gdb/remote-sim.c,v > > retrieving revision 1.4 > > diff -r1.4 remote-sim.c > > 46a47,58 Masaki MURANAKA wrote that this patch was against GDB 6.4. Please try HEAD instead. > Btw, I don't see these signals used anywhere in remote-sim.c. Why did > you need to add them? They used to be, until: revision 1.50 date: 2005/11/28 18:32:32; author: mmitchel; state: Exp; lines: +6 -11 * remote-sim.c (gdbsim_wait): Pass target signal numbers to sim_resume. Expect target signal numbers from sim_stop_reason. There's still uses of sim_signal_to_host in the simulator, but I don't quite understand most of them. I think they're all buggy. I went over Mark's patch carefully at the time, but now I see the result of sim_signal_to_host being compared against signals from sim_stop_reason, which uses sim_signal_to_target... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery