From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add "del" as alias to "delete"
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060406211125.GA3960@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44358251.7080706@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:04:17PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >>>2006-04-06 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> >>>
> >>> * breakpoint.c (_initialize_breakpoint): Add "del" as an alias
> >>> of the "delete" command.
> >>>
> >>Does anyone think we should make "dele" and "delet" work again too?
>
> Guys, this seems awkward and ad hoc (I realize it's my fault...)
>
> What if we make "delete" a command prefix (like "maint"),
> and then just branch from what follows it (eg. breakpoint,
> tracepoint, fork, checkpoint, display), with the default to be
> breakpoint.
>
> I'm not quite sure why this is broken only now...
> it used to work when "delete tracepoint" and
> "delete display" were possibilities.
You know, I had completely forgotten those were there. I wish I'd
realized before.
The reason it's a problem now is that you didn't add "delete
checkpoint", but instead "delete-checkpoint". If we switch it the
problem will go away.
There's a similar problem with detach, by the way. I used to type
"det" and now that doesn't work. Aliases or rename?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-06 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-06 16:24 Joel Brobecker
2006-04-06 16:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-06 18:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-04-06 21:04 ` Michael Snyder
2006-04-06 21:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-04-06 21:38 ` Michael Snyder
2006-05-17 16:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-04-06 21:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-05-05 20:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-05 22:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2006-04-06 19:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060406211125.GA3960@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox