From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6494 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2006 13:26:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 6482 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2006 13:26:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:26:26 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FQlY5-00007p-4k; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:26:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Add -var-info-path-expression command Message-ID: <20060404132621.GA380@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:22:02AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Any comments on this yet? I believe we've discussed the rationale for > -var-info-path-expression command in the main list, and agreed that it's > necessary. Yes, I think we've agreed on that. It would be nice if there were test cases and documentation to go with this. I've been putting off looking at this patch, because (A) I had a whole lot of other patches to review, and (B) it's huge and gnarly. I am not really sure that Apple took the right approach with C++ classes and run-time type information. Maybe they did, but it's not at all obvious. Sorry. If no one else reviews it, I will come back to it later. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery