From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9399 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2006 18:45:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 9376 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2006 18:45:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:45:42 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k33IirxO007846; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k33IiqO8009853; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k33Iiqlv028025; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:45:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200604031844.k33Iiqlv028025@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: eliz@gnu.org, bje@au1.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, newlib@sourceware.org, cygwin-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060403034217.GA27963@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:42:17 -0400) Subject: Re: raising minimum Texinfo requirement in src tree References: <20060331024135.GB31847@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> <20060402235418.GA20771@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> <20060403034217.GA27963@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:42:17 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 06:35:34AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > 2006-03-31 Ben Elliston > > > > > > PR binutils/1860 > > > Thanks, but that doesn't show the _reason_ for requesting Texinfo 4.4. > > What was the change in the manual(s) that prompted you to bump the > > minimum version? > > Here it is: > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 > > I believe it's @include{@value{}}. Indeed, I hacked the makeinfo in the OpenBSD tree to recognize that one. Guess I'll have to do a full import of a more recent makeinfo now. Not a big problem though, so no objection to the patch. Mark