From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4313 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2006 13:03:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 4304 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2006 13:03:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:03:56 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FQOio-0001Ho-Ci for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:03:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][SH] invalid registers Message-ID: <20060403130353.GA4920@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <437B5C5F.5080500@st.com> <20060330171503.GJ32409@nevyn.them.org> <44311B95.2040701@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44311B95.2040701@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 01:56:53PM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >This is OK. Only S/390 uses the frame_init_reg hook this way today, > >but it seems sensible. But please wait a day or two in case anyone has > >comments on the downside. > > Hmmm, perhaps that ought to be fixed. I don't believe all those target > really *know* what the value of all registers is in every frame. The hook is recent. > In any case, a 'day or two' has passed and nobody has said anything. Am > I OK to commit this? Yeah. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery