From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4086 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2006 02:40:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 4065 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2006 02:40:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:40:41 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2V2nJrP260348; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:49:19 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.243]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k2V2hunx223514; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:43:56 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2V2ea5s028195; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:40:37 +1000 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2V2eavF028187; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:40:36 +1000 Received: by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 0151C73724; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:41:35 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:28:00 -0000 From: Ben Elliston To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, newlib@sourceware.org, cygwin-patches@sourceware.org Subject: raising minimum Texinfo requirement in src tree Message-ID: <20060331024135.GB31847@ozlabs.au.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 I've just committed a patch that raises the minimum requirement on Texinfo from version 4.2 (released in April 2002) to Texinfo 4.4 (released in January 2003). DJ has advised me to consult with these projects about the change. Does anyone have any objections? If so, I will back it out and we can discuss. FWIW, I have been using Texinfo 4.8 on my Debian GNU/Linux system. I think this is a pretty conservative change that is needed to support some fairly modern Texinfo constructs in the binutils documentation. Thanks, Ben