From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23932 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2006 22:29:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 23924 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Mar 2006 22:29:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:29:24 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FOMgk-0003DK-Iv; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:29:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Message-ID: <20060328222922.GC11817@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <17160.63891.324530.937796@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <430B9BF8.500@apple.com> <17188.60739.749026.738477@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17198.37622.443418.520082@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17216.38283.618507.704220@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20051003131829.GA19106@nevyn.them.org> <17448.24343.362964.716378@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060328211723.GA10392@nevyn.them.org> <17449.46536.338017.576709@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17449.46536.338017.576709@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:16:40AM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > I never created a branch in the repository but kept merging changes in the > > > repository to my/Apple's changes. > > > > Unfortunately this means no one else can try what you've got... > > The reality is no-one will currently want to and it seemed easier to merge > locally. It works both ways. I'm not going to take a look at it while it's sitting on your local drive. > Incidentally if GDB changes version control, I think a distributed > system like Arch would make keeping local branches easier, if thats an > advantage. Now with CVS I have to wade through filenames starting with .#... I think SVN is the most likely change, and SVK works fine for this - I do that already with GCC. I want to migrate GDB, I just haven't had time to work through the technical hurdles so I haven't started trying to persuade folks it's a good idea. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery