From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4294 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2006 20:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 4276 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2006 20:08:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:08:42 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1FHnuh-0007yj-FS; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:08:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: GDB Patches , Randolph Chung Subject: Re: [RFA] linux multi-fork kill (re: "run", and executable file/symtab association?) Message-ID: <20060310200839.GA30634@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , GDB Patches , Randolph Chung References: <4410D0AC.1000505@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4410D0AC.1000505@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:04:44PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > Randolph, this is in response to your bug report. > Daniel, see if this looks OK to you. Instead of calling > pop_target (which, I agree, was iffy), we just go thru > target_mourn_inferior like we always did. > > Rearranged linux_fork_killall because of an unexpected > interaction with delete_fork -- at least one fork wasn't > getting killed, because delete_fork tries to be too clever. Looks good to me. You're right, I'll need to re-merge - how about you go first since I don't know when I'll have a chance to update that patch? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery