From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: James E Wilson <wilson@specifix.com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>,
binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: linker debug info editing
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060310200413.GA30219@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142020201.13901.29.camel@aretha.corp.specifix.com>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:50:01AM -0800, James E Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 04:49, Alan Modra wrote:
> > This is a first pass at debug info editing to remove bogus entries for
> > link-once functions.
>
> There is an equivalent gcc solution we could consider. Create a
> separate compilation unit die for each linkonce function. We could use
> section groups to tie the debug info to the linkonce function, so that
> the debug info disappears along with the function.
You have to finish enabling COMDAT support everywhere, in order to do
this; we (CodeSourcery) tried when it was contributed, but kept
encountering oddball problems on different platforms.
> We already have a similar scheme in use for header files, that mirrors
> the BINCL/EINCL stabs support. This was one of the new features that
> went into the DWARF3 standard. Unfortunately, this code is not the
> default yet. You have to specify -feliminate-dwarf2-dups to get it. I
> think there was some gdb work that needed to be done to complete the
> project, and us gcc developers aren't very good at volunteering to do
> gdb work.
I made the required changes, a year and a half ago or thereabouts.
> If we do need link time editing of dwarf2 debug info, there is a lot of
> useful stuff that could be done here, such as eliminating duplicate
> debug_abbrev entries. This is probably more complicated than what you
> are attempting here though, but it could perhaps be added later on top
> of your work.
There's quite a lot of compression that we could do at link time if
we're going to process DIEs at all. I think this would be a worthwhile
thing to do, and it requires something like Alan's done (although I
haven't looked at the patch yet).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-10 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-10 19:44 Alan Modra
2006-03-10 20:06 ` James E Wilson
2006-03-10 20:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-03-12 7:58 ` Jim Blandy
2006-03-13 12:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2006-03-13 20:19 ` Alan Modra
2006-03-14 15:10 ` Daniel Berlin
2006-03-13 4:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060310200413.GA30219@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=amodra@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=wilson@specifix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox