From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2563 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2006 21:45:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 2554 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2006 21:45:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:45:29 +0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1KLjB0E029264; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:45:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1KLjB6W000483; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:45:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1KLjBlX021597; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:45:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200602202145.k1KLjBlX021597@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: aoliva@redhat.com CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Alexandre Oliva on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:16:20 -0300) Subject: Re: cope with varying prelink base addresses References: <200602082139.k18LdXig008477@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060210014235.GB8310@nevyn.them.org> <20060213175637.4ac50484@ironwood.lan> <20060214020854.GA9848@nevyn.them.org> <200602141853.k1EIrENL014444@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2 > From: Alexandre Oliva > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:16:20 -0300 > > On Feb 14, 2006, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > >> From: Alexandre Oliva > >> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:40:36 -0200 > > >> On Feb 14, 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >> > If not, I can certainly manage Solaris; I don't have any BSD systems > >> > here but perhaps Mark K. can oblige? > > >> May I accept your offer, and hope Mark K. extends one too? Thanks! > > > Yup, I'll test OpenBSD and FreeBSD. > > Ping? Tested it on OpenBSD/i386 and FreeBSD/amd64. Testsuite is still running on OpenBSD/mips64, but the shared library tests all passed, so I think this is ok. I don't really like the all-caps function names, but I realize you were just following the existing practice here. Anyway, the final call is Kevin's. Mark