From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1391 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2006 20:19:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 1383 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2006 20:19:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:19:54 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1F8kAq-0000VM-FP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:19:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: fixes for type-punning warnings in GCC 4.1 Message-ID: <20060213201952.GA1888@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandre Oliva , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20051219221830.GA32448@nevyn.them.org> <20060122203323.GC27224@nevyn.them.org> <20060208045905.GA12327@nevyn.them.org> <20060210013927.GA8310@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602132013.k1DKDLH8031169@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 04:57:28PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Yep. It didn't look like those two occurrences were such a big deal. > I don't see why we should refuse to handle long double at all just > because we can't scan them in as such. But it's not my call, I guess. My only point here was that, if we know that DOUBLEST is a double, then casting it to a long double and passing it to a home-brewed long double reimplementation of ldexp is pretty silly; the other HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE conditionals were all really "DOUBLEST_IS_LONG_DOUBLE". On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:13:21PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Alexandre Oliva > > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:57:28 -0200 > > > > Ok to install? > > Looks ok to me. Me too. Thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery