From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4814 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2006 16:19:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4794 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2006 16:18:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from w099.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO duck.specifix.com) (64.220.152.99) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:18:57 +0000 Received: from [::1] (duck.specifix.com [64.220.152.99]) by duck.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B510FC47; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:18:54 -0800 (PST) From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@specifix.com To: Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix problem with scope.exp test, skipping past init0 call Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:19:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200602121510.01657.fnf@specifix.com> <200602131047.30428.fnf@specifix.com> <200602131604.k1DG4n9Y025733@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200602131604.k1DG4n9Y025733@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602131118.49981.fnf@specifix.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 On Monday 13 February 2006 11:04, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Hmm, if you didn't commit the fix yet, can you please hold off doing > that for a bit? From your explanation below, it turns out that this > might have caught a genuine genuine GDB bug. By "fixing" this we're > likely not to notice that. I believe it also causing lots of other testsuite failures as well. The scope.exp fix was special in that the original test was supposed to handle needing two successive "next" commands to get past init0, and that wasn't working. -Fred