From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2051 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 16:18:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2042 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 16:18:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:18:02 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id E509713C0F8; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:18:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:18:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror Message-ID: <20060210161800.GC2235@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060203215455.GA3501@nevyn.them.org> <20060206173550.GB22947@nevyn.them.org> <200602062254.k16MsagK009925@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060206225829.GA31895@nevyn.them.org> <20060208000855.GA5040@nevyn.them.org> <200602082107.k18L7xRh013417@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060209223719.GA3865@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:53:10AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:37:19 -0500 >> From: Daniel Jacobowitz >> >> Anyway, here's a patch updated in every way I can think of to make it >> less upsetting. Is this really better? Select to follow in the proper >> thread. > >I'm fine with this, if this is the best compromise we can reach. I'm wondering if a top-level "mingw" directory might simplify things here? Could most of the Windows accommodations be put in an "external" library and an external header file and just have gdb point to that? cgf