From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26029 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2006 18:20:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 26020 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Feb 2006 18:20:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:20:05 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1F7GOg-0007sk-Lf for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 13:20:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfa] Make the partial DIE cache more robust Message-ID: <20060209182002.GB29610@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <8f2776cb0602071511x3a337c30sa853b9cbac70d696@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0602071511x3a337c30sa853b9cbac70d696@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:11:45PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > This patch: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00066.html > > is approved, if it still applies. Thanks. It does, and I've just committed it after retesting on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I believe I've just suckered Paul into updating the rest of the patch series this originally came from, which was written to support using GDB, and running the GDB testsuite, with ARM's proprietary compilers. With a bit of luck, we'll be submitting more of those soon :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery