From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: minimalistic MI catch support
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 03:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060207030016.GA4152@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060207011600.GA18296@brasko.net>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 08:16:01PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 06:29:13PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > For the patch, in general it's better to avoid ui_out_is_mi_like_p when
> > we can. Because the text outputs are ignored in non-MI mode, this is
> > usually pretty easy; see the attached.
>
> Daniel, could you please explain the above in more detail. In
> particular, this patch adds specific functionality when in MI mode. Why
> do we care about how it acts in non-MI mode? Just curious.
Because it prevents the two from diverging, for one thing. It makes
sure that there is no non-cosmetic output between the two. This would
be useful for implementing the CLI output on top of the MI output.
> Defiantly this reason is better than the original patch. I think it would be
> best if we added a new enumeration called EXEC_ASYNC_CATCHPOINT_HIT, and
> returned that as the reason. In the future, we could easily return the kind
> of catchpoint that was caught. For instance,
>
> *stopped,reason="catchpoint-hit",catchpoint-kind="vfork",bkptno="1",forked-process="6570",thread-id="0",frame={addr="0x00002aaaaaeb6462",func="fork",args=[],from="/lib/libc.so.6"}
I like this.
> Finally, it irks me that all of the bp_catch_* commands are not being
> implemented in this patch. I see these enumeration values:
> bp_catch_load,
> bp_catch_unload,
> bp_catch_fork,
> bp_catch_vfork,
> bp_catch_exec,
> bp_catch_catch,
> bp_catch_throw
>
> I would really like to see a patch that supports all of these cases, or
> none. It's just confusing to FE's to have 2/7'ths of the case's
> implemented.
>
> If no one has time to do this, I will. I certainly am running thin
> though.
The problem with this is that some of those others are ill-defined
and/or broken. Fork and vfork only work on some targets, and they're
the only ones I would say worked "right". Load/unload should be
implemented but aren't, exec presents very tricky user interface
and symbol table problems, and catch/throw are hard to present
the correct context to the user.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-07 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-28 13:04 Markus Schiltknecht
2006-02-06 23:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-07 1:15 ` Bob Rossi
2006-02-07 3:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-02-07 12:01 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2006-02-09 6:28 Nick Roberts
2006-02-10 6:34 ` Nick Roberts
2006-02-10 11:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 14:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10 18:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 18:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10 20:17 ` Nick Roberts
2006-02-10 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060207030016.GA4152@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=markus@bluegap.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox