From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31800 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2006 06:35:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 31786 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2006 06:35:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (24.61.23.223) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:35:49 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 6D7A913C0F8; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 01:35:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:35:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror Message-ID: <20060206063547.GA16591@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060205001503.GB8728@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205193440.GB4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205202222.GB5574@nevyn.them.org> <20060205215036.GE4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205215659.GA7232@nevyn.them.org> <20060205223351.GF4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205224121.GA7919@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060205224121.GA7919@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 05:41:21PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >How would you feel if I created two MinGW-specific files, and would you >prefer not to be their maintainer? I don't mind MINGW-specific files. Would it be less troublesome if you were the maintainer of those files? I don't mind eyeballing MinGW patches but I probably shouldn't be the final authority on whether they are appropriate or not. cgf