From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2547 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2006 22:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 2537 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Feb 2006 22:41:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:41:23 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1F5sZN-00024H-Nf for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:41:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror Message-ID: <20060205224121.GA7919@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200602041435.k14EZ6NK016329@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060205001503.GB8728@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205193440.GB4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205202222.GB5574@nevyn.them.org> <20060205215036.GE4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060205215659.GA7232@nevyn.them.org> <20060205223351.GF4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060205223351.GF4718@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 05:33:51PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'm feeling deja vu here. I suspect that we've probably discussed this > before. :-) > > If so, I probably said something like "Maybe we could just standardize > on /bin/bash quoting and redirection rules and put a shell-like command > parser in gdb." Well, it'd work for me, but I have no idea if anyone relies on the current behavior or not. I guess we can come back to this one later :-) I'll post a revised patch on Monday and see if I can make folks a bit happier. How would you feel if I created two MinGW-specific files, and would you prefer not to be their maintainer? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery