Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: Various Windows (mingw32) additions, mostly relating to select or serial ports
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060205215958.GA7299@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3irruy8qk.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:01:07PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Well, OK, let's try this.  Create a new pipe.  Create yet another new
> thread which reads from the original pipe and writes to the new pipe.
> Freopen the new pipe onto stdin.  When the new thread writes to the
> new pipe, it signals the event loop once, and then waits.  When the
> event loop gets the signal, it indicates that it is OK to read from
> stdin, the new pipe.  When you reenter the event loop, it signals the
> new thread to tell it that it is interested in more data and more
> signals.

I'm not convinced this would work.  Remember, not only do we read from
this pipe just about everywhere, a lot of the time we don't pass
through the event loop.  We'd have to have a thread which did blocking
reads from the original pipe, wrote that data straight through to a new
pipe, and signalled an event whenever it performed a write.  Not only
would that be tricky to get right, but we've also traded off a thread
when selecting for a thread all the time.

Do you think the 10ms poll is sufficiently nasty to justify pursuing
this?  I suppose I could be convinced to give it another try...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-05 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-03 22:05 Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-03 22:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 12:43   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 15:13     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04  6:28 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-02-04 10:30   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 17:06     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-02-04 17:45       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 15:00   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-05  0:01     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-02-05 22:00       ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-02-06  3:27         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-02-06  4:03           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 12:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 15:11   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-04 15:23     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-04 15:30       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 21:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 23:02   ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-06 23:17     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-06 23:21     ` Christopher Faylor
2006-02-09 22:38     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-10  7:53       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 20:46       ` Mark Kettenis
2006-02-10 22:02         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-07  4:41   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060205215958.GA7299@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ian@airs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox