From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12052 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2006 15:14:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 12044 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2006 15:14:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:14:39 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1F5P7V-0004bR-QC for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:14:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ob] Rename NO_ERROR Message-ID: <20060204151437.GF17011@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060203215146.GA3349@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:00:05PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:51:46 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > The Windows (at least mingw32's version) headers apparently define NO_ERROR. > > The least of several cretinous things I've learned about Windows programming > > in the last week. > > Out of curiosity, what were the other cretinous things? (Mail me > privately if you think the answer will not be interesting to others.) I'm just referring to the other two patches I posted Friday night (and the responses they've received, not entirely unexpected). The explanation I just sent about waiting on handles, in particular, and the decision to put useful error messages well out of range of strerror. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery