From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26225 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2006 03:36:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 26214 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2006 03:36:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:36:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB50F48CC0C; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:36:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21779-01-2; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:36:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (s142-179-108-108.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.108.108]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B08148CBDA; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:36:01 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 2F8C447E7E; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:35:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 03:36:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Verify that address is provided in add-symbol-file command Message-ID: <20060203033556.GB6135@adacore.com> References: <20060202191549.GK31770@adacore.com> <8f2776cb0602021744t2145f76q3c624383e245c041@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0602021744t2145f76q3c624383e245c041@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 > > 2005-02-02 Joel Brobecker > > > > * symfile.c (add_symbol_file_command): Abort if the user forgot > > to provide the address when the file has been loaded. > > For F130-030. > > What's the F130-030? > > Assume it's a bug report identifier: I could be persuaded, but I'm not > too keen on including values indexing proprietory bug databases in the > public ChangeLog. I'm sorry, it's a copy/paste error. It shouldn't be in the public ChangeLog, of course! It wouldn't make any sense. Thanks for spotting this. -- Joel